The applicant filed an original application seeking refund of court fee from a matter settled in Lok Adalat. The Presiding Officer directed the registry to refund the fee and disposed of the application.
Direction to refund court fee
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 38
Case No. OA/944/2024
BARODA RAJASTHAN KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK Vs PHOOSA
RAM
Date: 18.01.2025. Present:
Shri K K Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Defendants
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed copy of OTS through Lok Adalat vide dy. no. 142 and submits that the matter settled in Lok Adalat and requested for refund of court fee.
Registry is directed to refund the court fee as per Lok Adalat orders.
In view of the above submissions, this Original Application
stands disposed off.
Copy of the order be given Dasti to the concerned parties. File be consigned to record, as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
BARODA RAJASTHAN KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK
PHOOSA RAM
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
