Presiding Officer of the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a review application filed by the applicant, who cited non-compliance of orders by the respondent bank. The court held that the filing was not a proper review petition and instructing aggrieved parties to take appropriate legal steps.
Review application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 8
Case No.RA/15/2025 IN SA/531/2025
ANKUR SHARMA Vs ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Date: 11.11.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri R K Bhargav, Counsel for the applicant
Shri Bhupendra Singh Shekhawat, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
This Review Application filed by the applicant and submits that the bank is not complying the orders passed by the Tribunal. This is not the case of review an order. If the counsel is aggrieved by non-compliance of orders they may take appropriate steps as per law.
In view of the above, this Review Application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review application can be allowed on the ground of non-compliance of Tribunal orders.
ANKUR SHARMA
ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
