Mukesh v. Au Small Finance Bank Limited
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 32
Case No.SA/344/2025
MUKESH Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 11.11.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Counsel for the applicant
Shri Ramnaresh Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant submitted that account stands settled and closed.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the applicant this Securitization Applications stands disposed of as infractuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MUKESH
- respondent
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court