Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's Review Application filed against its own judgment dated 02.05.2023. The Tribunal found no grounds for review and rejected the claim that the decision was made in the guise of an appeal to purchase time.
Review Application No.13 of 2023 dismissed. File consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
le
1
R.A. No.13 of 2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, LUCKNOW
Present: Pravas Kumar Singh, Presiding Officer
Review Application No.13 of 2023
Dated: 04. 1 1.2025
Anubhav Gupta & Ors.
, Applicant
Versus
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Ors.,
. . . . Respondents
Ld. Counsel for applicant: Mr. Swayambhoo Chandranshul, Advocate. Ld. Counsel for respondent-bank : Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.3: Mr. Nitesh K. Tripathi, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
'-\ -. / # , //
2
R.A.No.13 of 2023
(2)No application for review shall be made after the expiry of a period of thirty days from the date of the order and no such application shall be entertained unless it is accompanied by an afidavit verifying the application.
(3) Where it appears to the Tribunal that there is no sufficient ground for a review, it shall reject the application but where the Tribunal is of opinion that the application for review should be granted, shall grant the same: Provided that no such application shall be granted without previous notice to the opposite party to enable him to appear and to be heard in support of the order, a review of which is applied for.”
q=
R.A.No.13 of 2023
'1J
Review Application in the guise of appeal in order to purchase a time and to waste the time of this Tribunal.
Let the file be consigned to record room.
(Dictated)
r'\ \
(Pravas KurAr bligh) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Judgment signed, sealed, dated and pronounced in the open court on this 04th Day of November, 2025.
\h
(Pravas Kum} Sin£h) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
(Veeresh)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Review Application is maintainable as it appears to be filed in the guise of an appeal.
Whether sufficient grounds exist for review under Rule 5A of DRT Procedure Rules 1993.
How to dispose of the Review Application lacking merit.
Anubhav Gupta & Ors.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Ors.
Pravas Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
