The application was dismissed as infructuous. No arguments were heard from the applicant. The respondent filed no arguments, and the Tribunal disposed of the matter on the record.
None; the application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforderor £oceedinj |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| S.A.No.766/2023 03.11.2025 SI No.36 |
None appearedfortheapplica Mr. Deepak SinghSalhipore, Counselfor therespondent- present. Ld. Counsel for theresponden submits that accountrelatingto SAisclosed. Inview of fact, SA is dispose as infructuous Let thefilebeconsigne recordroom Order be uploaded on Tribunal’swebsite |
nt. Ld. FIis t-FI the d of dto the |
|
| (Dictated) (Pravas Kub_,S PresidingOffi (Veeresh) |
ingh) cer |
Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow
Respondent
Pravas Kuber
Veeresh Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
