The Debts Recovery Tribunal heard an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. The appellant withdrew the appeal due to a settlement between parties, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeal accordingly.
The second appeal (SA) is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 78
Case No. SA/635/2022
RAJENDRA PRASAD JANGID Vs KOGTA FINANCIAL INDIA LIMITED
Date: 17.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Rajendra Jangid, Applicant in person
Shri Vineet Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this SA, as the matter has been settled between the parties.
Request is allowed.
As the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore SA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties. File be consigned to record as per rules.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
CM
Rajendra Prasad Jangid
Kogta Financial India Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
