Sumit Kumar Khandelwal v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 30
Case No.SA/193/2025
SUMIT KUMAR KHANDELWAL Vs UCO BANK
Date: 28.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Vikas Meena, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Shri James Bedi, Counsel for the Auction Purchaser
Today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant despite passover, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sumit Kumar Khandelwal
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court