Uco Bank v. Pushpa
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's request to withdraw OA/763/2025 and ordered a refund of court fees, thereby disposing of the matter without substantive adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of OA/763/2025 allowed and refund of court fees ordered.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 2
Case No. OA/763/2025
UCO BANK Vs PUSHPA SHARMA
Date: 17.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Mahendra Rana, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the request to withdraw the application and obtain a refund of court fees is permissible.
Whether the application stands disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO BANK
- respondent
PUSHPA SHARMA
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court