Bank of Baroda, the applicant, moved to withdraw its Original Application (OA) and requested a refund of court fees after confirming the account was settled. The Presiding Officer allowed the withdrawal and ordered the refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 89
Case No. OA/1083/2022
BANK OF BARODA Vs M S UNIQUE AGRO
Date: 17.09.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Mamta Pareek, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms Jayshree Joshi, Counsel for the Defendants
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled and Counsel for the Defendants confirmed it. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
All the pending IAs stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Bank of Baroda
M S Unique Agro
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
