Bank applicant withdrew its appeal with a request for refund of court fees. The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, granted the refund, and disposed of the appeal and other pending applications.
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; refund of court fees granted; appeal and other pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 136
Case No.OA/706/2024
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Vs HARI RAM
Date: 30.10.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Ms Vidisha Kaul, Counsel for the Applicant
Counsel for the Applicant bank submitted that the account is settled. He wants to withdraw this O.A and he prays for the refund of the court fees.
Heard the applicant.
The prayer for withdrawal of OA and refund of court fees is allowed. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rule. Accordingly, this OA stands disposed of.
All the pending IAs stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Hari Ram
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
