Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant to withdraw the statutory application (SA) with a liberty to revive it if required, given that the bank confirmed regularization of the account.
Withdrawal of the Statutory Application allowed with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 61
Case No.SA/232/2025
SUNITA SAINI Vs THE RAJPUTANA MAHILA URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
Date: 30.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Akash Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Shubham Choudhary, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, respondent counsel submits that account is regularized. Applicant wants to withdraw this SA with a liberty to revive the same in case of any difficulty.
Request is allowed.
Accordingly, SA stands disposed of with the liberty to all the parties to move application in case of any exigency, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SUNITA SAINI
THE RAJPUTANA MAHILA URBAN CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
