Punjab National Bank v. Ms Wood Is Good
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no.52
Case No. OA/644/2023
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Vs MS WOOD IS GOOD
Date: 21.02.2025
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vineet Mehta, Counsel for the applicant
Shri Abhishek Wadhwa, Counsel for the Defendants
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed an application for withdrawal and refund of court fee, however Registry is not accepting the joint application with two prayers.
Registry is directed to take separate fee for each prayers and IA could be listed.
Prayer of the applicant for withdrawal and refund of court fee is allowed.
Therefore, OA stands dismissed as withdrawn. Court fees may be returned as per the rules.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
- respondent
MS WOOD IS GOOD
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court