Hdfc Bank v. Naseeb Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant bank abandoned objection to the writ application citing compromise between parties. The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dismissed the object as withdrawn and directed refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fees ordered. OA dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/618/2025 HDFC BANK Vs NASEEB CHAND
25.07.2025 Item No.48
Present: Mr. Amit Rishi, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Rajendera Prasad, Authorized Representative, and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.21,84,148/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
HDFC Bank
- applicant
Naseeb Chand
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court