This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 18.12. Sr. No |
2025 .29 OA No.358/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| A | ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 358/2025 ICICI Bank Limited ..Applicant Versus Ramesh Sampat Bhalerao and Anr. ..Defendants Ms. Rakhi Indani H/for Mr. Shete Umesh N. - Advocate for the applicant bank. None present for the defendants. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that defendant No. 1 and 2 have been served by hand on 11/7/2025. The service report has filed on record and marked as “A”. Despite service, the defendants neither appeared nor filed WS. Statutory period for filing WS has already been over. Hence, Counsel for applicant requested to pass ex-parte order against defendants. 2. Heard. 3. None appeared for the defendant Nos.1 and 2, though served. In these circumstances, it appears that, the defendants are not interested in filing the Written Statement or has nothing to show cause; hence, they are hereby proceeded ex-parte**. 4. The counsel for the applicant is hereby directed to complete affidavit of evidence marking exhibits to original documents before next date of hearing. List this matter for arguments on13**thJanuary, 2026. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[Ambadas] (OA No.358/2025) Page 1 of 1
ICICI Bank Limited
Ramesh Sampat Bhalerao and Anr.
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
