Disposed

Bank of Maharashtra v. Mr. Ramesh Baburao Kaduskar

DRT18 Dec 2025OA/2/2024

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

Bank of Maharashtra versus Mr. Ramesh Baburao Kaduskar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | DRT (2025)

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

	18.12. Sr. No	2025 .27 OA No.2/2024
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
	9	ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 2/2024 Bank of Maharashtra ..Applicant Versus Mr. Ramesh Baburao Kaduskar and Ors. ..Defendants Mr. Sharad V. Natu - Advocate for the applicant bank. None present for the defendants. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that defendant Nos. 1 to 3 have been served by hand through Court Commissioner whereas the LR of defendant No.4 has been served through RPAD on 22/09/2025. The Court Commissioner’s Report and the affidavit proving service of summons is filed on record at Exhibit-10 and 13 respectively. Despite service, the defendant Nos.1 to 3 and LR of defendant No.4 neither appeared nor filed WS. Statutory period for filing WS has already been over. Hence, Counsel for applicant requested to pass ex-parte order against defendant Nos. 1 to 3 and LR of defendant No.4. 2. Heard. 3. None appeared for the defendant Nos.1 to 3 and LR of defendant No.4, though served. In these circumstances, it appears that, the defendant Nos.1 to 3 and LR of defendant No.4 are not interested in filing the Written Statement or has nothing to show cause; hence, they are hereby proceeded ex-parte. List this matter for arguments on12^thJanuary, 2026.
		(Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

[Ambadas] (OA No.2/2024) Page 1 of 1