Union Bank of India v. Avinash Balkrishna Mahalpure
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal disposed of an original application for recovery of dues as withdrawn after the loan account was settled under a One Time Settlement scheme on 05/04/2025.
What did the court decide?
Original Application No. 34/2025 disposed of as withdrawn; original documents returned; court fees refunded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 26.08. Sr. No |
2025 .34 OA No. 34/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.34/2025. | ||
| Union Bank of India ..Applicant V/s. Avinash Balkrishna Mahalpure ..Respondent Mr. Pande K.D. - Advocate for the applicant. None for Respondent. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant bank filed application for withdrawal of this OA and submitted that applicant bank |
||
| filed aforesaid OA for recovery of outstanding dues from | ||
| defendants. In the meantime the defendants have settled their loan account under OTS on 05/04/2025 and the loan account of the defendants is closed. Hence applicant bank do not want to proceed further and wants to withdraw the Original Application. 2. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. 3. Heard. |
||
| 4. In view of the amicable settlement of loan account under | ||
| OTS, I pass the following order. |
[Ambadas] (OA No.34/2025) Page 1 of 1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
ORDER A. As the loan account is settled amicably under OTS, the O.A. No. 34/2025 stands disposed of as withdrawn. B. The original documents, if any filed be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. C. The Court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. D. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Union Bank of India
- respondent
Avinash Balkrishna Mahalpure
Coram
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court