The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad dismissed the application in default for the applicant's non-appearance, vacating any interim stay and consigning the file.
Application dismissed by default. All interim stays vacated. File consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
26.08.2025
Sr. No.16 SA No. 290/2024
SECURITISATION APPLICTION NO. 290/2024.
Asha Ganpatrao Vedpathak. ..Applicant
Versus
DCB Bank Ltd. and Anr. ..Respondents
None for the applicant
Mr. Thote D.K. –Advocate for respondents present.
1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the
proceeding for applicant.
2. Today, none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the
applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No. 290/2024 stands
dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of
accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
[Ambadas] (SA No. 290/2024) Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the securitisation application stands dismissed for non-prosecution when the applicant is absent.
What is the fate of interim stays pending in the proceeding upon dismissal.
Asha Ganpatrao Vedpathak
DCB Bank Ltd.
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
