Yes Bank v. Mohammad
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed an amendment to replace Yes Bank with J.C. Flower ARC. Upon subsequent settlement, allowed the withdrawal of the Original Application and disposed of the matter.
What did the court decide?
Amendment allowed. Groundless Application allowed to be withdrawn. Matter disposed of as withdrawn. Refund of court fees permitted.
What the court decided
| 16.09.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.288 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Aparna Jagtap i/b Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Defendants. |
|||
| By way of Amendment Application (I.A. No.2331 of 2023), Applicant wish to bring proposed Applicant, J.C. Flower ARC on record in place of Yes Bank. Applicant has also filed an affidavit in support The proposed Amendment is subsequent in nature and is necessary for the efficacious disposal of the O.A. on merits, so, in the interest of justice, I.A. No.2331 of 2023 is allowed keeping all issues and contentions open to the Defendants. Accordingly, I.A. No.2331 of 2023 stands disposed of. Applicant to carry out the amendment today itself and supply the amended copy of the O.A. to the Defendants. |
Page 1 of 2
| Now, list this matter after lunch. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 03:00 pm nrb – 33 |
19 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed Pursis (exhibit-19) and submits that she has received the instruction from the Applicant, J.C. Flowers ARC that the matter has been settled, so, the Applicant wants to withdraw the present O.A. No.288 of 2022. The statement is taken on record and will act as an order of the Tribunal. In the light of pursis (exhibit-19), O.A. No.288 of 2022 is allowed to be withdrawn. Accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Page 2 of 2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Applicant, J.C. Flower ARC
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court