In a money-laundering connected proceeding, the application was disposed of as withdrawn after the parties reached an amicable settlement.
OA permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO.
CASE NO.
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA254 08101/2s J |
ShriArunMishra,Advforthe Applicant jointhroughV.CalongwithShri ShubhamBurman,Advpresentbeforethe dais ShriYashwardhanAgrawal,Adv forthe Defendant Onmatter being takenApplicantCounsel apprisedthat throughamicablesettlement thetotalsettlementamountisRs. 4,40,00,000/- Defendanthasalreadybeen deposited. ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthatthe DefbndanthaswithdrawntheSA No.779122filedagainsttheRespondent Bank. |
|
| ApplicantCounselorallypraysfor withdrawthisOAalsolookingto settlementandamount has alreadvbeen deposited. |
||
| Sinceno furtherdispute remainsnoneed toprosecutethisOAon merit. |
||
| OralrequestofApplicantCounselis allowed. |
||
| Applicant sideispermittedtowithdraw thisOA. |
||
| OAisdisposedofaswithdrawn. |
GONTD. ORDER. SHEET
PAGE NO
CASE NO
DATE OESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER
Record be consigned to the record room.
(Ram lwas Patel)
Presiding Officer
DRT : JABALPUR
(M.P. & C.G.)
REMARK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
Defendant
Ram lwas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
