Dismissed
Smt Shivkumari Harikishan Gudipati v. Encore Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
DRTMA/27/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 03.04.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.27 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. Mr Saurabh Shrivastava i/b Ms Optimus Legal, Advocate for Respondent No.1. None for other Respondents. |
|||
| Order-sheet of the learned Registrar dated 17.04.2024 shows that no representation was made by the parties. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, M.A. No.27 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. |
|||
| rst - 42 | Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Unknown Applicant
Respondent No.1
Other Respondents
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court