Disposed

Hdfc Bank v. M/s. Magnus Meditourism Pvt. Ltd.

DRT6 Nov 2025OA/15/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the withdrawal application (I.A. No.2330 of 2025) by the Applicant Bank, noting that the underlying matter had been amicably settled and the loan account regularized during the pendency of the writ petition (O.A. No.15 of 2024). The original petition stands disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal application allowed; original O.A. disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees refund granted.

Hdfc Bank versus M/s. Magnus Meditourism Pvt. Ltd. — DRT (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

06.11.2025	Exh.	*Roznama-MDRT-II* *O.A. No.15 of 2024*	Next date
		Mr Sachin Satpute (through VC), Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Defendant.
rst - 16		Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application I.A. No.2330 of 2025 supported by affidavit for withdrawal of the O.A. No.15 of 2024. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that the during the pendency of the O.A, the matter has been amicably settled with the Defendants and the Loan Account has been regularized. In view of the above submissions, I.A. No.2330 of 2025 is allowed and resultantly, O.A. No.15 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn. The Applicant shall be entitled to refund of court fees as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II	Closed

Hdfc Bank v. M/s. Magnus Meditourism Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hdfc Bank v. M/s. Magnus Meditourism Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Bank of Maharashtra versus Rajesh

Mr Ankur Rajnikant Raichura and Anr. versus Gic Housing Finance Ltd.

Mrs Kusum Vijay Sangani versus PNB Housing Finance Limited and Others

Union Bank of India versus M/s. S R Plast

Ravindra Laxman Shinde versus Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd.

Bhaktawar Anwar Khan versus Bank of Baroda