The Debts Recovery Tribunal permitted an original application to be withdrawn. The account was regularized, defendant no. 3 expired, and the bank was allowed to file a fresh OA.
Original Application permitted to be withdrawn; bank at liberty to file fresh OA.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 23
Case No. OA/127/2023 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED Vs NILESH KUMAR MEENA
Date: 26.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vineet Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, account has stands regularized. Defendant no. 3 had expired. It appears that the bank must have taken either alternative bank guarantee or guarantee. This Original Application is permitted to be withdrawn and the bank will be at liberty to file fresh OA.
All the original documents be return to the bank after obtaining acknowledgment of the same.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
IndusInd Bank Limited
Nilesh Kumar Meena
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
