Canara Bank v. Rk Enterprises
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar declined to register an application filed by Canara Bank against M/s R.K. Enterprises as objections raised by the Registry were not removed.
What did the court decide?
Application declined to be registered.
What the court decided
( /r
7
lN THE DEBTSRECOVERYTRIEI t{fifiF+l,DELHI
Date:12.00.2025
NDN/111 4 I2o2s IDRT-ll/Delhi(oA)
CANARABANK vs
M/S R.K.ENTERPRISES
It has beenobservedthat despite providing the several opportunitiesthe applicanthas not removed the objections/defects raised by theRegistry, till date'
ln terms ofpower conferred by Rule23 read with Rule 5(a) of DRT(Procedure) Rules,1993, as amendedfrom time to time'the aforesaidoAisherebydeclinedtoberegistered
Copy of orderto be uploaded on DRT website'
a$
(Yash Pal) Registrar DRT-Il, Delhi
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 and Rule 5(a) of DRT (Procedure) Rules, 1993 after defects were not removed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- respondent
M/s R.K. Enterprises
Coram
Yash Pal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court