Bank of Baroda v. Tanshu Plastic
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar DRT-II, Delhi declined the Ordinary Appeal filed by Bank of Baroda due to persistent failure to remove registrable defects despite prior opportunities.
What did the court decide?
Registration of the Ordinary Appeal declined
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.II, DELHI
Date: 2O.O9.2O25
NDN/124212o2s I DRT-I l/Delhi (oA)
BANK OF BARODA VS
TANSHU PATSTIC
!t has been observed that despite providing the severar opportunities the applicant has not removed the objections/defects raised by the Registry till date.
ln terms of power conferred by Rule 23 read with Rule 5(a) of DRT (Procedure) Rules, 1993, as amended from time to time, the aforesaid OA is hereby declined to be registered.
Copy of order to be uploaded on DRT website.
#
,U
(Yash Pal) Registrar DRT-Il, Delhi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
BANK OF BARODA
Coram
Yash Pal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court