Canara Bank sought to withdraw an Original Application and obtain a refund of court fee. The debtor was unrepresented. The Presiding Officer disposed of the application and directed the registry to refund court fees.
Directing the registry to refund the court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 111
Case No. OA/1126/2023
CANARA BANK Vs M/S RAMDEO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Date: 23.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Anil Kumar Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that entire amount deposited and wants to withdraw this Original Application and prayed for refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
CANARA BANK
M/S RAMDEO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
