Assets Reconstruction Company India Limited v. Sri Ravindra Bahadur Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Order regarding restoration of settled OA No. 1215 201, dismissed under appeal; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
| Date oforder or proceeding |
Order withsignatureof court | Officeaction taken with date |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| M.A.No.85/2022 13. 11.2025 SL.No.37 |
BH of Ld.a Counselfortheapplica present. None appearsforthe respondent. BH of Ld. Counsel for the appli submitsthat theapplicantbank is pressing the M.A.sincetheMAwasbro forrestorationof O.A. No.1215 201 whichaccount has already beensettled. The submission was taken on reco |
ntis cant not ught 8in rd. |
|
| Inviewofthefact,the M. accordinglydisposedoff. Let the file be consigned to re room. Order be uploaded on the Tribu website. (Dictated) g (Pravas Kumi Presiding CYB (Mugish) |
.is cord nal’s ingh) er |
Appl
Respondent
Pravas Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court