Canara Bank v. M/S Shri Jay Ambey Mineral
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 26
Case No. MA/248/2023 IN OA/500/2020
CANARA BANK Vs M/S SHRI JAY AMBEY MINERAL
Date: 23.01.2025.
Present:
Shri Vikas Jain along with Shri Shashank Jain, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the respondent
This MA is filed to seek clarification on cost memo. It is duty
of the advocate to file the cost memo at the time of final arguments or within one week thereafter, however, the cost has been awarded in the final order.
Recovery Officer is directed to take care of the same to the
extent of the court fee paid by the applicant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
CANARA BANK
- respondent
M/S SHRI JAY AMBEY MINERAL
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court