An application for extension of time in a recovery proceeding was dismissed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, as the relief sought was deemed unnecessary and there was a failure to make the primary payment.
Relief sought was extension of time; denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 22
Case No.MA/200/2025 IN SA/92/2025
SAHUN KHAN Vs HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Date: 04.12.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kuldeep Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
This Misc. Application has been filed for seeking extension of time. The matter has been settled and the terms of settlement are not fulfilled. The extension is being sought by the applicant on the ground of death in the family of the applicant. Even primary payment of Rs. 2.00 Lac has not deposited by the applicant. The Tribunal is not interested in the extension of the time.
Accordingly, this Misc. application stands dismissed. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
SAHUN KHAN
HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LTD
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
