The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur, disposed of a miscellaneous application based on the respondent bank's counsel's submission that the matter had been settled and the applicant prayed for withdrawal of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 117
Case No. MA/182/2023 IN OA/529/2020 TARAD TRADING COMPANY Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Date: 29.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Akarsh Mathur, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Vikram Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that matter has been settled and he prayed for withdrawal of MA.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the applicant, this Misc. Application stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Tarad Trading Company
Central Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
