Shri Rajiv Mehta v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur dismissed a Miscellaneous Application raised by the applicant despite his late appearance and absence for three prior hearings, imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000/-.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the DRT Bar Association.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 124
Case No. MA/18/2024 IN SA/782/2022 SHRI RAJIV MEHTA Vs HDFC BANK
Date: 29.05.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Anudyuti Maitra, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Abhishek Bhandari, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the M.A applicant continuously disturbing between the arguments of the respondent bank. There is no ground made for allowing this Misc. Application because there is not one, but from the last three dates applicant was not appeared. Today, he present and gave an excuse that the matter was posted for reply, therefore, he was not appearing before this Tribunal.
In view of the above, this Misc. Application stands dismissed with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the DRT Bar Association within 10 days.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Misc. Application should be allowed considering the applicant's continuous absence and lack of grounds for delay.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Rajiv Mehta
- respondent
HDFC Bank
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court