Petitioner sought to set aside an order of dismissal. The Presiding Officer found merit in the application and dismissed it.
The Misc. Application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 9
Case No.MA/175/2025 IN OA/583/2024
MS FAKIR INDUSTRIES Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
Date: 28.10.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Sanjay Kumar Shukla, Counsel for the Applicant
In this matter, the counsel who has filed this Misc. Application for setting aside the order had filed Vakalatnama in the Original Application and since no reply was filed by him, right to file reply was closed and the OA was decreed.
There is an averment in the Misc. Application that within one year final order was passed and the OA was disposed of.
In view of the above, there is merit in the Misc. Application and the same deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Misc. Application stands dismissed.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
MS FAKIR INDUSTRIES
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
