Dismissed

State Bank of India v. Dhruv Wellness Ltd.

DRT15 May 2024TA/38/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a transfer of Original Application No.38 of 2023 filed by State Bank of India against Dhruv Wellness Ltd., the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application for want of prosecution because the applicant's counsel failed to file the required undertaking after sufficient opportunities to comply.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of Original Application No.38 of 2023 for want of prosecution.

State Bank of India versus Dhruv Wellness Ltd. — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

15.05.2024

Sr. No.13

		TOA No.38 of 2023
classifi- cation	No. of Exh.	State Bank of India Vs. Dhruv Wellness Ltd.
		Ms Fatima Lakdawala – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
		1. The order-sheet reveals that the applicant’s counsel failed to file the undertaking. Today, the learned
		counsel submits that the officer has to file the
		undertaking. Despite granting sufficient opportunities, the advocate on record and the officer failed to comply with the order. Hence, Transferred Original Application No.38 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶7

Radhika

State Bank of India v. Dhruv Wellness Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Dhruv Wellness Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Shrichand D Kishnani Deceased Through Legal Heirs Vivek S Kishani and Ors. versus Canara Bank

Bank of India versus Sanjay Baburam Gupta

Union Bank of India versus Vishal Vishnu Mohite

Ms Satyam Industries versus Deustche Bank

Mr Paresh Shamaldas Dani versus Punjab National Bank

Bank of India versus Hanumanth