Ms Satyam Industries v. Deustche Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of a securitisation application where applicants sought a stay on an auction. The court found the auction failed as the bidder did not deposit the remaining 75% consideration after paying 25%, and did not seek a time extension under Rule 9(4) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules. The application was disposed of with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application No.215 of 2023 disposed of with no order as to costs; specified interlocutory applications disposed of.