The single judge allowed the withdrawal of a Section 43(1-6) application filed by borrowers against a bank. The applicants had settled their loan by depositing Rs. 36.30 Lakhs, and the bank requested withdrawal of the application.
Section 43 application disposed of as withdrawn; Order consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDE R.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No.........
| OATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA887/23 09t05t24 |
Appticantsby ShriShivKumar Dubey, Advocate Respondent byShriA.B.Sahu,Advocate |
|
| CounselforApplicanthasfited anapptication for withdrawalof5AsupportedwithaffidavitofShri GyanendraTiwariAppticantNo.-2on03/04/24.lt]s statedthattheApplicantshavefited thepresentSA assaitingtheactioninitiatedbytheRespondent-Bank undertheSecuritisationAct.ltisfurtherstatedthat duringthependencyoftheSAtheAppticantshave settledtheloanaccountsbydepositingtheentire OTSamountaggregatingtoRs. 36.30Lacandthe BankhasaskedtheApplicantstowithdrawthe presentSAforissuanceofNoDuesCertificateand reteaseoforiginaItitledeedofthemortgaged property.TheCounseIfortheAppticants further praysfor withdrawal of thepresentSA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheApplicantandthe submissionmadebytheCounsetforAppticantsthat theApplicants havesetttedtheirloanaccountsby depositofRs.36.30Lactowardsfutlandfinal setttement,thepresentSA stands disposedofas withdrawn.Record be consignedto therecordroom. (Ram Pate[) Presidingofficer |
Applicants
Respondent-Bank
Ram Pate
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
