Disposed
Cent Bank Home Finance Limited v. Yogesh Verma
DRTOA/1221/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No.....
CASE No........
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oAt22y23 t3l0sl24 |
ShriHemantDubey,AdvfortheApplicant Noneforthe Defendants |
|
| Matteristakenup forhearingonIA no.3079124applicationfor withdrawalofOA. |
||
| Hefurtherpraysforreturning50%ofcourtfee asperdebtrecoverl'tribunal(refundofcourt fee) rules20I3datedI5/05/I3. InsupportofapplicationaffidavitofRitesh Ranjantheauthorizedoftlcer cumBranch Managerof ApplicantBankis also tagged. ApplicantCounselapprisedthat after filing thisOADefendants have settledtheiraccount throughOTSproposal thereforeApplicant Bankdesirestowithdrawalthis OA. |
||
| Lookingtocontentsofapplicationand affidavitprayerfor withdrawalisallowed. Applicant Bank ispermittedtowithdrawthis oA. Registryisdirectedtorcfundtlrecourlf-eca per rules. OAis disposedofaswithdrawn. Recordbeconsignedtothe record room. (Ram atel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Applicant
Defendants
Ramatel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court