On the statement that the matter has been settled, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appeal for default due to non-appearance of the applicant. No substantive legal principle is laid down.
SA 724/2022 is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-3, KOLKATA Order Sheet (Continuation)
Case No. SA/72412022 Subhasish Ghosh Vs. Authorized Officer,
Central Bank of India
Office action
Order with signature with date and
dated Signature
of parties when
OEq]!p-!8
u25,11.2024 Present:
Si-Na-12
- For SA applicant
: None
- For Respondent Ban k
: Ld counsel N4r Samrat lvlukheriee wlth R. l4aiti
5A/72412022 is taken up for hearing.
None appears from the side of SA applicant.
Ld counsel for respondent bank submits that the
matter has been settled.
Be that as it may, SA 724/2022 is dismlssed for
d efa u lt.
(KAMAL DE)
PRESIDING OFFICER
DRT-III, KOLKATA
Subhasish Ghosh
Authorized Officer, Central Bank of India
KAMAL DE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
