Allowed

Ms Washima Leather and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank

DRT25 Nov 2024SA/67/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed and dismissed an interim application for withdrawal of a full S.A. which arose amicable settlement between parties and consequent withdrawal of class main S.A..

What did the court decide?

The instant interim application was allowed and dismissed as withdrawn as settled amicably. The Respondent Bank is directed to return the Title Deed of the mortgaged property and other relevant docume

Ms Washima Leather and Anr. versus Punjab National… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | DRT (2024)

¶1

Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)

¶2

CaseNo.SA/6	7l2O22 M/s.Washima Leather & An;. NationalBank
DateofOrder	Orderwithsignature
OrderNo.06 Dt.25.11.2024 Sl.No.17	Present: ForApplicant:Ld.CounselT.Majumder ForDefendant:None lA/4O84/24istakenupforhearing. Heard Ld. counsel appearingforSAApplicant. Considered. Noneappearsfrom thesideof theRespondentBank.
	Ld. Counselforapplicanthasfiledaput up petitionbeing A/4OA3124forhearingoflA/40A4124prayingfor withdrawal ofthemainS,A.Sincepetitionis putup,the I.A.isdisposedof.Theapplicationissupportedby Affidavitoftheapplicantl,1rs.Lilufa Laskar. Duringthe pendencyoftheS.A.thematterhas beensettledwiththe Respondent Bank andtheRespondent Bankisnot^goingto continuewiththeinstant^proceeding,Sincethisisan amicablesettlementbetweenthe^partiesand^the Applicant intendstowithdrawthe^{main S.A., noprejudice} raillbecausediftheI.A.is^{allowedwithoutinviting} responsefrom theotherside.^{Accordingly,theinstant l.A.} isallowedandstandsdisposed^{ofbeingdismissedas} withdrawnassettled^amicablY. TheRespondent^{Bankis directedtoreturn theTitleDeed} ofthemortgaged^{propertyandother relevantdocuments} to theSAApplicant,^{ifitisnotalready done, as perrules'} S.A. No.67of^{2022alongwith allotherpendingI A s,if} any,isdisposed^{ofaswithdrawn.}
	Filebeconsignedto^{Record Roomafterobservingall} formalities.
	(KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata l

Ms Washima Leather and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Washima Leather and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank versus Akhtar Parwez and Anr.

Sudhansu Nag and Ors. versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and Anr.

Mr Ratin Chandra Roy versus PNB Housing Finance Limited

Tushar Kanti Dey versus Federal Bank

Rabi Dey Sarkar versus the Authorized Officer of Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited

Subhasish Ghosh versus Central Bank of India