Ms Extol Education Society v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
gfl. q. iqt -at /zozz
*Tl T{fe sTkfiur wddgq
(qturi{r vo offiero wu;
(ffi{ oTffi -qmftqaft qrq Fqrsq}d)
vs. c.qqq -at/zozz
1
a
M.q-ffi-&d \g-dttq M, 1s3,qtd$ trs.+crd 4o2ool, aRI ffi{,
- dren reqFRqfr ,fr frd.r-flql sq 6ftq- 1/3srqcknflo.rqdffi srr6w fiqra Yqft 462016, onfus re=lrw olrcm * fr.d. qefl-rn sq 6-ftq-1/3 srrleldrg flqttr $r6ftr frcrd vq.ft 462016,gq.fr +OZOto,
........sil+qt-6rlsr I
E
1
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Relevant emerge from the specific facts and evidence before the Court. This is a re-cognition application (Section 14), and the applicant seeking which the applicant was a cheque.
The applicant was a cheque dishonoured Section 138 N.I Act. It was dishonoured Section 420 IPC/CF Actues of the applicant. If these were in a cheque. The applicant was a cheque dishonoured Section 138
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sh. Suresh Kumar
- respondent
Sh. Suresh Kumar vs. Union of India
Coram
J. A.S. Ok توافق
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court