This disposal order treats a Special Appeal against an ADM order as withdrawn. The respondent-Bank decided to withdraw SARFAESI proceedings and not execute the impugned order, rendering the SA infructuous.
Special Appeal disposed of as withdrawn; case consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA644t23 14t08t24 |
ShriPiyushBhatnagar,Advforthe Applicant ShriAdamyaBajpai,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| Onmatter being takenforhearingto applicationforcondonationofdelayand interimreliefasprayed throughSA against theorderdated04105123passedby theADMIndoreRespondent Counselhas apprisedthat theRespondent-Bankhas decidedtowithdrawallsarfaesi proceedinginitiatedagainst theApplicants inpursuanttodemandnoticedated 24103115Ann.A-I. On giveninformationApplicantCounsel praysorallylibertytowithdrawthisSA withlibertytofileafreshwhenever occasionarises. Withthisobservation thatwithdrawingthe demandnoticedated24103115issuedby the Respondent-Bankagainsttheborrower order dated04105123passedbytheADM Indorehas becomeinfroutousnoneed to prosecutethisSAfurther. Applicantsarepermittedtowithdrawthis SAwithliberry to fileafreshwhenever occaslonanses. RespondentCounselfurthersubmitsthat Respondent-Bank hasfurtherdecided not toexecutethe order dated04105123passed bytheADMIndore. |
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No.
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| SAis disposedofaswithdrawn. | ||
| Recordbeconsignedtotherecord room. Patel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Applicant
Respondent-Bank
Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
