Dismissed
Messers Ajay Purvar Kiranan and Retail Galla Shop and Others v. Kepri Global Capital Limited
DRTSA/618/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE 1{o
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA618/23 t3t08t24 |
NonefortheApplicant Shri VipulSaraswat,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| OnmatterbeingtakenRespondent Counselinvitingattentiononordirdated 10104124,13t05t24 and03106t24submits thatnooneappearedonbehalf of ApplicantandTribunalhasalreadypassed peremptoryorder. |
||
| Perusalofrecorditrevealsthat underWp No.15537124theHon'bleHighCourt passingorder datedl4106124haJrelegated tothepetitionertofileapp.op.iute applicationforamendingtheorderdated 19ll0l23passedbythis Tribunalhowever yetnosuchapplicationisfilednor availableonrecord. Itis furtherrevealsthattheApplicantside hasalsofiledanappeal beforeHon'ble DRATAppealNo.253124underwhich Hon'bleDRATpassingtheorderdated 13103124hasdirectedtoconsiderand decidethisSA most expeditiouseventhen Applicantsideremainabsentsincelast three dateofhearingwhichrevealsthat Applican thisSA. thaslostinterestto prosecute RespondentCounselfurther praysfor dismissalofthis SAsince,tppiicantsiOe is notappearedinthismatteionseveral dateofhearing. |
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER |
|---|---|
| ThereforethisSA isbeingdismissedfor wantofprosecution. |
|
| Recordbeconsignedtoth cordroom. asPatel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) ( |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Special Appeal should be allowed despite the absence of the Applicant for multiple hearings.
Whether the failure of the Applicant to prosecute their appeal warrants dismissal for want of prosecution.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Applicant
Respondent
as Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court