On 28th Sept, 2024, DRT-1 at Hyderabad disposed SA No.55/2024 as withdrawn because the Respondent Bank had already closed the applicant's OTS and loan account, leaving nothing for the National Lok Adalat to decide on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADAL.AT
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL-I AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPT,2024
PRESENTi
S.A.No.55./2024
DandugudumuShankaraiah
... Applicant
Versus
State bank of India, Warangal branch, Rep. by its Authorized Officer
... Respondent
Reference made by:-
Applicant Respondent Bank
M/s.Disha Law Farm
..none
-:AWARD:-
file fresh SA if there is any need in future. Inview ofthe said memo filed by the Respondent, the SA.No.55/2024 is disposedof as withdrawn.
(Given under the hand and seal of the LokAdalat Bench on this the 28th day of Sept, 2024)
sd/-
sd/-
sd/-
(K. KRANTHT KUMAR) (GUMMADI GOPI CHANDI Member PO /Judicial Member
.$
ii: rrs?lm ;
tr",%#
Dandugudumu Shankaraiah
State bank of India, Warangal branch
SHRI GUMMADI GOPICHAND
V. RAGHU
K. KRANTHI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
