The National Lokadalat dismissed the application as withdrawn after understanding that the impaired loan account had closed. The applicant was granted liberty to file a fresh application if needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOKADALAT
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL- I AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPT, 2024
PRESENT:-
S.A.No.126/2023
M/s. Sindhu Industries
... Applicant
Versus
Canara Bank, Hanamkonda branch, Warangal - 506 O01. Rep. by its Authorized Officer
... Respondent
Reference made by:-
Applicant Respondent Bank
. . none
Sri B. Sreenivasa Reddy
.:AWARD:.
024 filed by the Respondent Bank nd loan account of Applicant has survives to decide on merits. osed*{fith a liberty to the Applicant to
file fresh SA if there is any need in future. In view of the said memo filed by the Respondent, the SA.No.12612023 is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Given under the hand and seal of the LokAdalat Bench on this the 28th day of Sept, 2024)
sd/-
(v. RAGHUI Member
sd/-
sd/-
(K. KRANTHT KUMAR| (GUMMADT copr CHANDI Member PO /Judicial Member
r:vw. "'$fi,?i??l{;'^'
M/s. Sindhu Industries
Canara Bank
GUMMADI GOPICHAND
V. RAGHU
K. KRANTHI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
