Ms Maa Vaishnavi Devi Udyog v. Indian Bank (Allahabad Bank)
DRTSA/517/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sAsl7l2 22101124 |
ShriNasir Ahmed,AdvfortheApplicant Shri R.K.Joshi,AdvfortheRespondent Matteristakenupforhearingoninterim reli asprayedthroughamendmentagainstt order dated31ll)l23passedbytheDMUalo Replytoamendmenthas already beenf-rl whichisonrecord. Boththecounselsheard' |
f e d |
|
| ApplicantCounselbyinvitingattention affidavitfiledalongwithapplicationthror"t SureshKumarsubmitsthatnostatusol' executorismentionedunder theaffidavitth isnothingonwhichpost he is posted. |
n TE |
||
| ApplicantCounsellirrthelsubtllitst affidavithasnotbeenfiledasperrequircrr't appr S d ha da fo tak l1ob p ApplicantCounselfurtherbyinvitingattent onnoticeissuedbytheTehsildarGuandhar t t t r hvS po S on S Sc edu d I1 0 0 24 and S SSI I h 0 I 2 r p fb n e n'l p r t r t t a t h t C t r0 on aotl ltS u^x LI o order. RespondentCounselbyopposingthepr apprisedthatpropertyhasalreadybeen byissuingsalecerlificateinlavouro1'auc purchaser sinceauctionpurchaserisnot the partyundertheSAApplicantsare entitled toanyinterimprotection. offirstproviso o1'section14ofthesar act. I I |
Si 0n at nt hi al ys of er ld ron de not |
¶5
GONTD. ORDER.SHEET
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court