Smt Geeta Patel v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/989/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order sheet lists an application appearing without the applicant's advocacy; a future hearing is scheduled or the matter is marked for final hearing depending on appearance.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA989/22 22101124 |
NonefortheApplicant ShriAmanJain,AdvfortheRespondent |
|
| RespondentCounselappriseclthatmaltcrr wronglylisted thereisnourgency. |
||
| SinceApplicantsicieisnotavailablcrratteli beingadjourneclrvilh tltisobscrrationtl)ato nextdateofhealingilnooneappearccltr behalfofApplicant thenthisSAshallb dismissedforrvantofprosecution otherlt'is mattershallbcheardfinallyil'pleaclinglb both thesidearecompleted. |
||
| Letthematterbelistedon051031241brl'in hearingat2:30PM. (lLam t\Ya I'}atcl) Presidin 0fficer D.lL.T,.labalpur (M.P&C.G) |
¶5
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶6
PAGE No
¶7
CASE No
¶8
| DATE DESC OFTHE ORDER |
REMARK |
|---|
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sh.ram Niwas Patel
- Order 2 · Sh.ram Niwas Patel
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court