Dismissed
Smt Soma Chakraborty and Anr. v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/50/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
LA.No. 377/2024 and all pending applications disposed of as withdrawn allowed.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation )
¶2
| CaseNo,SA/5 | smt.soma Chakraborty&Anr. Vs. BankofBaroda Ol2023 |
|
|---|---|---|
| DateotOrder | Orderwithsignature | Ofli<eactionwith |
| OrderNo.03 Dt.19.09.2024 Sl.No.27 |
Present: ForApplicant ForDefendant Ld. CounselS. Bhattacharjee None |
|
| ss | Ld CounselfortheApplicantflled LA.No. 377of2024praying for withdrawalof themainS.A. Theapplication is supportedby AffadavatoftheapplicantMrs. Soma Chakraborty.Duringthe pendencyoftheS.A.thematterhas beensettledwiththe RespondentBankandtheRespondentBankisnotgoingto continuewiththeinstantproceeding.Sincethasisanamicable settlementbetweenthepartiesandtheApplicant intendsto withdrawthemain S.A., no prejudicewillbecausediftheI.A.is allowedwithout invitingresponsefrom otherside.Accordingly, theinstantLA.isallowedandstandsdisposedofbeing dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably. |
|
| 5.A.No. 50of2023alongwith all otherpendingt.A.s,if any,is disposedof as withdrawn |
||
| File beconsagnedtoRecord Roomafterobserving allformalitaes. | ||
| (KamalDe) Presd ngOfFicer DRT'3,Kolkata |
¶3
__L
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Soma Chakraborty
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court