Subrata Saha v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
A Debt Recovery Tribunal in Kolkata allowed a settlement application filed in support of a withdrawal petition, dismissing the main appeal and all pending applications as withdrawn and settled amicably between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the main appeal allowed; main appeal SA No.41 of 2022 disposed of as withdrawn; all other pending IAs disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet ( Co ntin uatio n )
Subrata Saha Vs. TheAuthorized Officer,IndianBank & Anr.
t
t otti.e;ction with Date of Order Order with signature i order No.03 Present : o lg:ozq Sl. No.19 For Applicant : Ld. CounselK. Chakraborti For Defendant : Ld. CounselP. Bandyopadhyay Ld Counsel for theApplicantfiled I.A.No. 3402of 2024 praying for withdrawal ofthe main S.A The application is supported by Affidavit of theapplicantMr. SubrataSahaDuringthe pendency of the S.A. thematter has been settled with the s5 RespondentBank and the Respondent Bank is not going to continue withthe instant proceeding sincethis is an amicable settlement betweenthe parties and the Applicani intendslo withdra$/ the mainS.A., no preiudicewill be caused if the I A is allowed withoutanviting response from other sideAccordingly' the instant l.A.is allowed and standsdisposed of being dismassed aswithdrawn as settled amicably I A No 340lof 2024 being theput up petitionis also disposedof S.A, No.41 of 2022 along !/ith all other pending I A s' if any' are disposedof as withdrawn ' File be consignedto Record Room afterobservingall formalities' ( Kamal De ) Presiding Officer DRT-3, Kolkata
L
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Subrata Saha
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Indian Bank & Anr.
Coram
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court