Nirmal Kumari v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The court in SA/439/2024 before DR Tribunal-I, Chandigarh dismissed an application by default as the applicant failed to appear despite being cited, appearing uninterested in pursuing the matter.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/439/2024 NIRMAL KUMARI Vs HDFC BANK
17.12.2024 Item No.14
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh. Vaibhav Singh Tara, Counsel for respondent No.1/HDFC bank. Ms. Arshdeep Kaur, Counsel for respondent No.3/auction purchaser.
This is second pass over but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nirmal Kumari
- respondent
HDFC Bank
- respondent
Auction Purchaser
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court