The Applicant bank filed an affidavit stating the parties had compromised the matter and it does not want to pursue the appeal. The DRT-I, Chandigarh dismissed the OA as withdrawn.
OA dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/907/2023
UNION BANK OF INDIA (CORPORATION BANK) Vs DEVI LAL
17.12.2024 Item No.65
Present: Sh. Naveen Kumar, Nodal Officer/UBI. None for defendants.
Applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Manjeet Singh, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.21,44,945/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Union Bank of India (Corporation Bank)
Devi Lal
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
