This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 01.06. Sr. No |
2024 .35 SA No. 386/2023 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION NO. 386/2023 | ||
| Neelima Ganpat Gaikwad ..Applicant Versus Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent |
||
| None for the applicant Mr. H.S. Advant h/for Mr. S.V. Adwant - Advocate for respondent. |
||
| The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. In this matter after filing this Securitisation Application and getting the notices issued, the applicants are not appearing. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the matter. 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.386/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room**.** |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.386/2023) Page 1 of 1
Neelima Ganpat Gaikwad
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court