The Debt Recovery Tribunal disposed of a securitisation application as withdrawn after the respondent counsel submitted the entire amount had been received and the account closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 0 S |
1.06.2 r. No. |
024 11 SA No.234/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.234/2023 | ||
| Mukesh Chhotelal Nagar ..Applicant Versus Poonawala Housing Finance Limited. ..Respondent Mr. S.G. Doodya - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Mehta Punit Satish – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. In this matter the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the matter has been settled and the entire amount has been received by the respondent and the account is closed. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent bank, I pass the following order: ORDER |
||
| A. Securitisation Application No.234/2023 stands disposed off as withdrawn. |
||
| B. All pending IAs in the proceeding, if any are disposed off accordingly. |
||
| C. Consign the file to the Record Room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.234/2023) Page 1 of 1
Mukesh Chhotelal Nagar
Poonawala Housing Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
